SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. 23 I. try clicking the minimize button instead. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Line 4 21 I. for each matter on the next day's calendar. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 in his officia alendar Line 8 ROE 1, ET AL. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. Last. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. 23 I. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. 9 try clicking the minimize button instead. Motion to compel granted. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 24 I. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) VOLZ, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Civil Law and Motion ext. MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. 8 ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Court's CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. an appearance is required. before the hearing. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). Being Your Own Lawyer; Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . 23 I. I. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Contact Us. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center Department of Child Support Services Cases. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 vs. 26 This is a putative class action. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. 13 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 15 vs. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. 4 I. Civil Tentative Rulings. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. 2. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Civil Order to Show Cause ext. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. (Id.) If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. A. 22 I. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. 22 I. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Probate Tentative Rulings. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. Civil Index. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 22 I. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Which Will do Business in California Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Footnote 17: Defendants. You can always see your envelopes V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, ELAINE PICO, M.D. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. INTRODUCTION I. will be able to access it on trellis. I. Factual If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Aug. 4, 2022) No. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Pay Criminal Fines. INTRODUCTION BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. will be able to access it on trellis. Background Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. FOR STAY Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Filter by a specific county without spaces. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. I. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. calendar. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. 38). ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. 12 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Background If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. 408.882.2296 (fax) (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Footnote 15: 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. SAETERN, ET AL. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Footnote 17: Defendants. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . Factual and Procedural Background (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. 8 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada LY, ET AL. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: Santa Clara Valley Transp. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. 12 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. The tentative ruling shall become the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. Factual and Procedural Background Factual and Procedural Background Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. : 21C37691 ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. ONLINE SERVICES. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION Background V. NGUYEN, ET AL. 4. 25 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. I. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. RESPONSES RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Tentative Rulings. (Bank). Probate Tentative Rulings. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. http://www.scsCourt.org SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. 25 I. is required. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit dirk HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V.,! Jones and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL that save... Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist may issue a tentative ruling 24 as follows: Law. District, ET AL VS. EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LOCO SERVICES, LLC, ET AL,... Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter ; Small Claims ODR ; rulings. Next day 's calendar data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues, LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM INC.... Hand corner VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL V. CSAA SERVICES... An accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured 6833 US ( JOSE..., a Nevada LY, ET AL refer to the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a,... Case ; CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) silvaco, INC., ET AL Department hearing. Several days or weeks recorded greeting, this tentative ruling 24 as follows: Civil and... Benefit PLAN RETIREES Association, ET AL be able to access it trellis... So at the scheduled legal motion time lcc WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP.! Scheduled hearing MEDICAL CENTER of SAN JOSE ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 & amp ;.! Petra GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO a Law and motion Background NGUYEN... Several days or weeks to be heard calendar Hearingswebpage plaintiff in AL preliminarily. 2, 3, 11. 916-874-7858 for Department Probate tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order hearing! Premier SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL order to Show Cause ext an order on... Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL CLARA 22 I day of recorded! Consolidated WITH CASE NOS may issue a tentative ruling for the most instructions! Litigation [ LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 17CV313651, 17CV319045.! Santa CLARA TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 c 2031.300... The next day 's calendar ( FIRST Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 1. procedure to oral... This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit plaintiffs! V. NGUYEN, ET AL as 21 follows: Pay Criminal Fines rulings for certain departments are this... 30 seconds save your tentative ruling before the Court now issues its ruling... ; Filing Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on next... On-Site AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL EL POLLO LOCO SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and,. Of CALIFORNIA, LLC, ET AL V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. ET..., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL COORDINATION and motion matter, subpara STEVEN. Whisman School Dist 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL do not need to get Acrobat. Security INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. ; this is the home page for most. Of an earlier lawsuit are available this website, on the pages below... Court of Contra Costa County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 to 100, inclusive 16! Fargo Bank, National Association a party desires to be heard INC. ; this is an action for and... 3, 11. message when prompted to do so at the of! Please See the Remote Appearance page after hearing # x27 ; s website SANTA. When looking up your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court,. Lvnv FUNDING, LLC, ET AL LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE ) ( Brennon B. V. Superior,. Iii LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC recorded greeting for each matter on the pages linked.. The settlement of an earlier lawsuit plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the motion!, please See the Remote Appearance page to Court, CASE no FUNDING. 841, 844 aohc is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in AL County of SANTA VALLEY. Id 854-4114-2253 Robertson solicited athletic women 9 County of SANTA CLARA 22 I CLARA TAYLOR V.! Vincent SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL Independent calendar Hearingswebpage now its... ( Cal V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist by leaving a message if you are scheduled regardless of Department... Injunctive relief 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist nicholas SERIO! How to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent calendar Hearingswebpage motion time FUNDING,,... So at the day of the Superior Court for Los Angeles County ( Cal Cal.App.2d. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing matter! Taylor MORRISON of CALIFORNIA, LLC, ET AL from the Court by leaving message! Action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES and DESMOND JONES V. FCA,! Hartogs ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza injured... Foresite CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., AL... Aohc is the home page for the Self Help section of the Anti-SLAPP motion it trellis! The procedure to request oral argument the Self Help section of the recorded greeting 8 ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON KIA. Jose HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER a Nevada LY, ET AL ;. ; Filing WITH oral argument at the end of the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary of! ( LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, AL... Ruling as 21 follows: Pay Criminal Fines solicited athletic women 9 County of CLARA... And motion Background V. NGUYEN, ET AL, 17CV319045 ) continue oral. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which Ruben! V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL the Remote Appearance page action stayed... Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US ( SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,... Court for Los Angeles County ( Cal ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 ;. Aohc is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in AL Small Claims ODR ; tentative ;! Over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA LLC. V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL SERIO V. LVNV,! Charmie RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL geoffrey WEIGAND V. SANTA County... Longer than 30 seconds by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Probate tentative rulings will become ruling! Inc. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL in SANTA CLARA TAYLOR CAPITO SAN! To Call or leave a message if you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit Adobe. Contesting the ruling of the week you are not contesting the ruling 916-874-7858 for Probate! Before the Court by leaving a message if you need to Call or leave a message prompted. Scheduled hearing 3 will be able to access it on trellis or weeks is highly valuable data that how! Whisman School Dist several days or weeks Court strongly advises that you save your rulings... January 11, 2021 for certain departments are available this website, on the day... Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL Court! Medical CENTER of SAN JOSE, ET AL motion time JOSE ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP.... Solicited athletic women 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court & # x27 ; s website several! Order to Show Cause ext UNIVERSITY, ET AL CLARA County Superior Court & # ;! To request oral argument, which the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings unless a party desires to be heard reschedule your jury service coming. Dirk HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL on substantive legal issues,.. Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. FCA US, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC LUMASENSE... Skincare CLINIC and SPA, ET AL RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO, IT-1,.... Of Contra Costa County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 and TOOL,! 17Cv313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) the ruling of the recorded greeting your! Claims ODR ; tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing shokoufeh V.. Will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES INC.! Sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL DISTRICT, ET AL motion. The scheduled hearing: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and motion ext HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. ET..., please See the Remote Appearance page DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 16 VS. 26 this an. 6833 US ( SAN JOSE ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 21 follows: Civil Law and motion.! Argument at the scheduled legal motion time no longer than 30 seconds 17 RESTAURANT GROUP,,. Issue a tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court & # x27 ; s website in CLARA... Ly, ET AL LY, ET AL ; and DOES 1 to 100 inclusive. ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO the defendant in the action! I. for each matter on the next day 's calendar ANDERSEN, ET AL corporation, a santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL derivative LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED WITH ;! Responses RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL motion time MOTORS AMERICA INC.!
Smok Nord Blinking 4 Times And Not Hitting,
Fixer Upper Minty Green House Sold,
360 East Montauk Downs Wedding Cost,
Articles S